mogmoogle wrote:
honestly guys i dont care. im serious i didnt meen to offend anyone. all im saying is its my opinion. i seriously understand you have yours. but do you really care. i meen you got your point across. im saying you win. i even said after my first post that i was sorry i said it that way because i was pissed off when i did. it just turned into an arguement. i never ment it to turn out that way. and im not being sarcastic. i dont know how many ways i can say im sorry and i give up... let me know on that rose 
haha and im trying to fix up some scripts in dragon. although i ended up just screwing it up more. im trying like come on. dont you ever say anything when your pissed off and frustrated?
haha and im trying to fix up some scripts in dragon. although i ended up just screwing it up more. im trying like come on. dont you ever say anything when your pissed off and frustrated?Fair enough. It's just not very constructive or encouraging to developers to just attack what is basically provided to you for free out of the goodness of someone's heart. There aren't a whole lot of people out there writing tools like Dragon for UO and I imagine every time they see posts like this it makes them want to move on to other projects.
The lack of 3-way transitions has been a known issue with Dragon for a long time. You'll find a lot of posts about that here. That is really one of the main reasons that UO Landscaper and Map Generator came about.
TThere are some workarounds for the issues in Dragon, but there is almost always some "manual" editing needed to do touch-up. There are also some techniques that you have to use when creating your map.
My recommendation is to try punt's map generator. It is a new project, is being actively developed right now, and supports 3-way transitions. But please, if you don't like the program, please don't say it "sucks", that doesn't really help anyone. Offer some contructive criticism and ideas on ways it can be improved.
,
only now have problems with scripting dragoon